There is no excuse for the absence of the arts in an
American public school system. The current economy of recession, with its
cutbacks, job losses and exportation of labor to cheaper workforces, is
certainly no such excuse. It is a hard-hitting reminder that we have always
relied on our public education to prepare the next generation of students for
the next generation of jobs.
A report by the National Center on Education and the
Economy’s New Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce, entitled
“Tough Choices or Tough Times” is critical of our test-based educational
policies, finding that, “Too often, our testing system rewards students who will
be good at routine work, while not providing opportunities for students to
display creative and innovative thinking and analysis.”
Routine work, whether blue collar or white, describes the
jobs that are being exported at an accelerating rate. This is the basis for the
criticism that we continue to prepare today’s students for yesterday’s jobs.
Even as we intensify our focus on science and mathematics knowledge and skills,
we constrict student exercise in the innovation and creativity they will need to
use them.
This report predicts that now “the best employers the world
over will be searching for the most competent, most creative, and most
innovative people on the face of the earth, [who are] comfortable with ideas and
abstractions, good at both analysis and synthesis, creative and innovative,
self-disciplined and well-organized, able to learn very quickly and work well as
a member of a team.” Several generations of American students have now passed
through an educational system that has seen the continuing diminution of time
and resources devoted to instruction and exploration in the arts.
Despite a growing body of research and evidence that the
arts improve academic performance in all areas, and dramatically increase a
child’s prospects for success in school, work and life, the arts have been
crowded out of the school day for the students who need them most. Another
study, by the Arts Education Partnership, tracked schools in economically
challenged communities, and found that arts programs keep children in school.
Children who might otherwise misbehave or drop out can become enthusiastic
learners. Teachers increase their effectiveness, and arts programs reduce
teaching turnover in these struggling schools.
We arts advocates have spent a lot of words on the economic
impact of the arts, about community growth and development, quality of life
issues, the business climate on Main Street and tourism. We naturally tend to
describe arts education with a different affection, but the economy is rapping
our knuckles with a ruler to make us stop daydreaming, sit up and pay
attention. South Dakotans have been valiant in their efforts to keep arts in
schools. It is becoming an increasingly difficult debate in nearly every school
district, and will only get worse as the year goes on. The recession took longer
to hit South Dakota than many states, and recovery will likely come later as
well. This is not the time to give up on education, and definitely not the time
for the arts to drop out of school.
Our finest argument is the economy; we must understand and
use it. Contact South Dakotans for the Arts for information on the studies and
reports I have referenced here, and for much more research and findings on the
efficacy of the arts in education. The arts matter when it comes to educating
the workforce of today, and even more importantly, tomorrow. Education propels
our economic engine forward. Without the arts, we will all be left behind.